Études de cas

Courthouse in La Alpujarra Administrative Centre

Justice réparatrice

* For image references, please scroll to the bottom of the page.

Author of case study: Marcela Torres Molano

Geopolitical location of space:
Carrera 52 No. 42-73
Medellín, Antioquia

Extant? Yes

Architect: Not specified

Timeframe of RJ/TJ process in this space:

Start date: 17 July 2019
End date: 18 July 2019

Background information:

A Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) first instance hearing for victims of forced disappearance in Medellín’s Comuna 13 took place here. The objective of this hearing was to establish whether or not there are unreported burial sites in Comuna 13 or its surroundings (the Comuna 13 is one of the most deprived neighbourhoods of Medellín). This was an important TJ hearing of the Special Jurisdiction for peace. It was a first instance hearing to establish if a further investigation was needed for this particular case.

The most important encounter was between victims and public institutions and organisations that were responsible for the search or exhumation of victims. The institutions were asked to publicly demonstrate to the victims their plans, measures, actions, processes, achievements, challenges and proposals during the complex panorama.

Is restorative justice actually taking place in this space?

Yes, a Transitional Justice public hearing of the Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) took place in this courthouse. The hearing was implemented during 2 consecutive days and had a total duration of ten hours.

Is this space designed/arranged for safe listening?

The courthouse has a regular arrangement where judges sit in a front line in front of the room. However the JEP clarified that the hearing was an instrument to guarantee the necessary and irreplaceable participation of the victims, whose rights are the raison d’être of the JEP.

Who is the audience/the intended participants for this space?

This was an encounter between the JEP judges, the local government of Medellín, the families of missing victims of the Comuna 13, and representatives from non-Governmental organisations.

How or to what extent is this space public?

This is an urban complex of government buildings that belongs to the administration of Antioquia department and Medellín municipality.

What are the politics of this space, either in terms of its location, design, spatial, or visual aspects?

The Courthouse is located in a complex of governmental buildings that includes an open plaza where civic activity and demonstrations generally happen. It is a very symbolic place for social causes in Medellín. This is an institutional and well recognised governmental structure. The hearing took place in a regular courthouse, following the institutional protocols of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP). As any other JEP hearing, the judges wear the black robes with indigenous shapes embroidery, characteristic of this Special Jurisdiction.

Physical/factual description of space:

The hearing took place in the fourth floor of La Alpujarra Administrative Centre, officially known as the José María Córdova Administrative Centre. An urban complex of government buildings built in 1980. The Alpujarra Centre has two buildings separated by a public plaza, and includes public businesses as the National Tax Administration and the seat of Teleantioquia (a regional TV channel). It has its own metro station (Alpujarra) which makes the site easily accessible.

The Courthouse’s main room has a regular Colombian justice arrangement with judges seated in front, on top of an elevated stage (capacity of the room: 168 seats, besides the judges). To the left, there is one wood structure equipped with a microphone for individual interventions. In front of the judges, there was an empty space used for presentations and performances from collectives and victims. The hearing had a series of very important symbolic acts, such as leaving empty chairs that evoke the disappeared victims and the relatives who died waiting for them to arrive.

The lateral walls were decorated with the pictures of the victims and black silhouettes representing their absence. A television screen, with the names of the victims was situated to the right of the stage, and a bigger projection screen was located to the left. Artificial lighting (white lamps) played an important part of the room illumination.

Analytical description of space:

Even though the courtroom was not designed for TJ purposes, the fact that collectives and victims were allowed to appropriate it with their symbolic acts gave it a sense of safety and inclusion. However, the hierarchical seating’s arrangement put the judges in a superior status compared to the victims, which is not an ideal scenario for a reparative process. Moreover, during some symbolic acts, the judges had to change their seats, and exchange them with other participants, demonstrating that the regular arrangement of courthouses was not ideal for reparation acts.

One other important spatial element was the plaza located outside the building, a very symbolic place for social causes in Medellín. The courthouse is located inside a complex of governmental buildings, that includes an open plaza where civic activity and demonstrations generally happen. This plaza became an extension of the hearing site, where other supporters and victims’ families had the opportunity to occupy and manifest. Colombia has no certainty about the total number of victims of forced disappearance or other people reported missing. The official record established that between 1970 and 2018, 80,000 people were forcibly disappeared; 460 of these cases have been registered in commune 13. 384 are currently missing, 76 were murdered and 8 appeared alive. Out of the total, 322 cases were men and 62 women.

During the JEP hearing participants were allowed to expose their cases and had the opportunity to ask questions and demand clarification from the governmental institutions. After this hearing ended, the JEP ordered the Government of Antioquia the “construction of a proposal for dignity and historical memory of the victims of forced disappearance in commune 13. This was an important hearing for the TJ system, as it was part of the truth clarification of one of the most problematic military operations during the Colombian conflict, “La Operación Orion”, in which 92 civilians disappeared.

Bibliographic references:
Image references:
Partagez ceci
Tweet ça
Envoyez ceci par e-mail

Études de cas

Vanessa Sicotte

est auteure, conférencière, chroniqueuse et podcasteuse dans les domaines de l'architecture et des arts décoratifs. Elle termine sa maîtrise en histoire de l'art à l'Université Concordia, à Montréal, et détient un baccalauréat en commerce avec une majeure en marketing de la John Molson School of Business. Elle a étudié la psychologie industrielle à Los Angeles, en Californie. Sicotte est l'auteure de deux ouvrages publiés sur le design (2015, 2018) aux éditions Cardinal.

Marcela Torres Molano

est candidate colombienne au doctorat au Département d'histoire de l'art de l'Université Concordia. Elle a une formation en design architectural et en activisme communautaire et détient une maîtrise en bâtiment et design urbain de la Bartlett School of Architecture à Londres, en Angleterre. Ses intérêts se concentrent sur l'art socialement engagé, les mouvements sociaux, l'activisme collaboratif dans des scénarios post-conflit, l'art produit collectivement et l'art produit en relation avec le cadre bâti.

Greg Labrosse

est candidat au doctorat en sciences humaines à l'Université Concordia. Ses recherches portent sur l'agentivité spatiale, l'esthétique sociale, les récits des jeunes et les représentations graphiques de la mémoire urbaine. Il a publié sur la relation entre les enfants, le jeu et l'espace public à Carthagène, en Colombie. Il a également travaillé comme éditeur sur des projets littéraires, dont Territorio Fértil, qui a reçu le prix María Nelly Murillo Hinestroza pour la littérature afro-colombienne.

Dr Ipek Türeli

est professeure agrégé et Chaire de recherche du Canada en architectures de justice spatiale (niveau 2) à l'École d'architecture Peter Guo-hua Fu de l'Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Ses intérêts de recherche comprennent le logement à loyer modique et le design participatif, la protestation civile et le design urbain, ainsi que les paysages des campus et la race. Ses publications incluent le livre co-édité, Orienting Istanbul (2010) et le livre (auteure unique), Istanbul Open City (2018).

Dr Cynthia Imogen Hammond

est artiste et professeure d'histoire de l'art à l'Université Concordia. Ses travaux portent sur les femmes et l'histoire du cadre bâti, les paysages urbains, la recherche-création et l'histoire orale. Elle a publié sur l'histoire spatiale du mouvement pour le suffrage des femmes, l'art public, les jardins et les politiques du changement urbain. En plus de ses recherches sur les espaces de justice réparatrice et transitionnelle, elle dirige un projet d'histoire orale sur les mémoires urbaines des montréalais et montréalaises.

Luis C. Sotelo Castro

est un ancien titulaire de la Chaire de recherche du Canada en interprétation de l'histoire orale (2016-2021). Il est professeur agrégé au Département de théâtre de l'Université Concordia et codirecteur du Centre d’histoire orale et de récits numérisés (CHORN) de Concordia. Sa subvention de la Fondation canadienne pour l'innovation en infrastructure lui a permis de créer le Laboratoire d'écoute active (ALLab) en 2018. Basé au CHORN, l'ALLab est un centre de recherche-création de premier plan pour le pouvoir transformateur de l'écoute.